Star F.
1/5
I live in a unit that has rodents, cockroaches, a non-working kitchen sink and a nonworking toilet that needs a bucket that is filled from the shower to be flushed. I have undeniable proof that the landlord has knowledge of these defects and has chosen to not repair the unit.
Some of the repairs have been needed for over seven years
In January 2024 I demanded the landlord bring the unit up to the standard of habitability required by law, he did not do so
In September 2024 I sent a list of required repairs as well as a demand for a copy of my initial rental contract, and a copy of several legal forms the landlords are required to provide including a copy of the registration certificate for this unit in the city I live in
I stated that I would begin withhold rent if he did not complete the repairs and provide me the necessary registration information for the unit
In February 2024 the city told the landlord to make some repairs but had not cited all of the repairs. He made no repairs before September 2024 and so when his unlicensed contractor came to make repairs he went downstairs and told the landlord that the toilet was not working and the kitchen sink only had ine working basin- and the landlord told the repair person not to repair anything other than what the city had put on its repair list seven months prior.
In January, after four months of trying to cover his ass, which he still hasn’t completed successfully, the landlord decided to hire this company to pursue eviction against me rather than repairing the unit. I am still flushing my toilet with a bucket because in my particular city you need a permit to replace the toilet and you cannot get a permit unless you are the owner of the property.
This company seems to be completely and totally incompetent in every way they can be. They have opened my Landlord up to a tenant harassment suit that I will be pursuing. Just by hiring this company he has lost a statutory $25,000 minimum
Just off the top of my head here are some of the defects in their pursuit of this eviction
1. Bad 3 day notice-
A. They gave a 3 day notice dated the 17th that they posted on the 18th.
B. This three day notice stated that the place to pay rent was the same address as where the unit is located.
C. stated that the rent could be paid Monday- Sunday between the hours of 9:30 AM and 5 PM. However,
a. for the three day notice period the person who was supposed to be available to collect was not available on a Saturday or a Sunday at the location as given
b. Monday the designated person to collect payment went on vacation out of the state and did not return until the next week.
2. They have multiple problems with their filing of an unlawful detainer including but not limited to the fact that they
A. attached a change in the terms of tenancy to limit the amount of money available to opposing counsel to $500, but you cannot do a change in terms of tenancy during an unlawful detainer action
B. Listed a nonworking phone number under their contact info
C. Stated a fair market value of $39.16 per day for the rental however even if everything else was hunky-dory math says the daily rental amount is $38.63
D. Stated they handed the three day notice to a resident, I have ring camera footage that proves otherwise
E. Did not fill out the Service section of the posted notice for the unlawful detainer, they left it blank
F. The rental contract they included as being a binding rental contract in the state of California does not have the appropriate signed legal addendum’s required by California law
G. is at an address that does not exist (rental contract says 1204, but there is no 1204 address that exists on this street only a 1200)
H. Does not include the tenants rights addendum as required by 18.30.100 of Ordinance 15-0016
I highly recommend if you are a landlord looking for an eviction company to not hire this company as they will cost you tens of thousands of dollars in attorneys fees and be completely inept in their pursuit of evicting your tenant.